Sexy dating site that uses paypal unity views on dating and sex
That kind of attention can be a concern not only for a dating site itself, but also for other online services that provide support to such sites, such as hosting companies and payment services. Sherman Act antitrust claims were dismissed (but with leave to file an amended complaint) because Infostream’s allegations that Pay Pal has an ownership interest in sites that compete with Infostream’s sites were deemed speculative.
So it’s not surprising that service providers seek to protect themselves contractually from the potential legal and business consequences of being associated with purveyors of shady, unsavory, or downright illegal services. Claims of common law fraud were dismissed (also with leave to amend), because Infostream did not adequately allege that it had detrimentally relied upon Pay Pal’s representations to it during the parties’ negotiations prior to the account termination.
This clearly shows the website's and the company's popularity amongst i...
Social media outlets are used by companies to further promote and enhance their brand image.
Google Page Rank gives the website a 7 out of a possible 10.
Compete gives the website a rank of 2,243 and a monthly unique visitor number of 967,326 and the website is ranked 3rd among its competition.
Infostream is the operator of two sites that “cater to adults looking for a non-traditional dating experience.” For a fee, Seeking facilitates “mutually beneficial relationships” between members who refer to themselves as either a “sugar daddy,” “sugar mommy” or “sugar baby.” Whats Your charges a fee to allow members to “buy and sell the opportunity of going out on a first date.”When Pay Pay moved to dismiss Infostream’s complaint, it was quick to point to media sources that have associated the Infostream sites with purveying sexual services (see Pay Pal memorandum in support of motion to dismiss, n. One of the cited articles included alleged accounts of sex-for-pay encounters arranged through the Seeking site by graduates seeking to pay off student loans. As to Pay Pal’s argument that it had reserved the right to terminate any account “at its sole discretion,” and “for any reason at any time,” the court found that the contract included, by implication, an implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing.
Infostream responded with the allegation that Pay Pal was invoking its unfairly, because the company continues to provide services to competitor sites that are similar to its own, such as Ashley Madison.com, which urges users to “have an affair,” and Arrangement Finders.com, which promotes “mutually beneficial arrangements” between men and women. Infostream had adequately alleged that obligation had been breached, the court said, if it could show that Pay Pal terminated the account in order to benefit Infostream’s competitors.
When Pay Pal invoked these sections in terminating the account of former user Infostream Group Inc., the company brought an action against Pay Pal alleging antitrust violations, breach of contract, fraud and unfair business practices claims. The court concluded that the Pay Pal terms could be found to be ambiguous, because the sexually oriented materials or services,” and, therefore, did not prohibit all such services.
Discouraging scammers is one of our top priorities.
We care about your experience on our service and take reasonable steps to prevent scammers from joining.
I know this doesn't really seem like an adult website, but there is the 'intimate encounters' category which is basically of adult theme, and Paypal is really strict with their adult policy.
Additionally, any website that goes against the Paypal TOS has their funds frozen for a period of 6 months, with little chance of ever reclaiming them.